Go


 
Top Drop Shadow
 
Darrell Lea: the family factor
Printer Friendly Version  Email A Friend  Add This

Darrell Lea: the family factor
Posted Date: 12/07/2012
By Stuart Bennie


Some say that in family businesses, the first generation creates, the second spends and the third destroys.

Perhaps putting it a trifle less harshly: The first generation starts a business. The second generation runs it. And the third generation ruins it

One cannot tell from Darrell Lea's website exactly how many Lea generations there have been but whether it is the third or not, the principle of generational rot nevertheless applies.

Research by the Boston based Family Firm Institute say that only one third of all family businesses are passed on to the next generation successfully. But the odds for the third generation get a lot worse and fall to 13 per cent.

There are many reasons cited for this phenomena. Here are 10 of them:

1. Lack of effective planning for transfer of ownership and skills.
2. Lack of commitment by the third generation having been brought up to enjoy the fruits of the first and second generations.
3. Getting a job in the company because it’s there rather than the family member being suited to it and/or taking a role that is out of one’s comfort zone out of a sense of duty.
4. Conflicting opinions in the family and a fuzzy chain of command.
5. Resistance to change is ‘normal’ but in family owned businesses seems to be more acute.
6. The ‘real’ decisions are made around the coffee table as opposed to around the boardroom table and outsiders are just that – on the outside.
7. Hanging on to old loyal staff who have grown old as the kids grew up.
8. ‘Incest’. Not having enough fresh outside input.
9. Too many family members in on the act – which the company cannot afford.
10. Family members wanting annual rewards when money should rather be pumped back into the business.

Having worked for a large retailer – a public company but with the family very much in control – I have personally witnessed the demise of an exceptionally successful organisation. Fortunately I saw in advance that the end was nigh and I got out several years before it hit the wall.

It had been in existence for about 130 years and had 15 large department stores employing thousands of people. The third generation took over as the second generation started to extricate themselves from the business. The downfall was a perfect case study of how to destroy a business in record time.

We used to sit around the boardroom table (I was the youngest) and congratulate ourselves on our collective years of service. We seemed to think that somehow this large number would protect us from any eventuality. We saw the world changing around us. We knew we had to change. And we set about doing it our way – which was the wrong way. That is more or less when I jumped ship. What should have happened is that the third generation family members should have been sidelined. In fairness the board asked for

their resignations which they refused to give. Had new blood been brought in with new (outside) ideas, the company probably would have survived. What brought it to its knees were two fundamentals.

They needed to centralise the buying but decided as an interim step to ‘regionalise’ so that not too many people would be upset. The second reason was that they regionalised with no processes or systems in place whatsoever so that the buyers were flying blind. A disaster ensued.

Whether we will ever know the inside story of the Darrell Lea demise remains to be seen. However maybe there are lessons to be learnt by all family owned companies. Bring in fresh blood and if you can’t afford it, get good outside counsel.

Stuart Bennie is a retail consultant at Impact RetailingEmail Stuart
Comments:

Thursday, July 26, 2012 by R.L.C
WHAT IT ALL COMES DOWN TO IS MONEY, AND THE YOUNGER LEA'S WERE MONEY HUNGREY. THE FIRST MR LEA WOULD BE HEART BROKEN. I WORKED THERE FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND LEFT WHEN THEY GOT MONEY HUNGREY IT WASN'T THE SAME FAMILY FRIENDLY COMPANY TO WORK FOR ANY MORE. AND WHAT'S WITH THE PRE-PACKRD STOCK THAT'S WAS THE ONE THING THAT SET YOU APART FROM THE REST AND PEOPLE LIKE THAT EXPERIENCE OF WATCHING HOW THINGS GOT DONE. MY MUM WORKED THERE FOR 25YRS AND LOVED IT UNTIL THEY GOT MONEY HUNGERY. IT JUST SAD, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT'S KEPT AUSTRALIAN ANYMORE?.
Saturday, July 14, 2012 by Laurian
Having dealt with Darrel Lea for years following is what I believe are the three main reasons for their demise:
1. The 3rd generation syndrome. They squandered far too much money on their lifestyle.
2. They grew their business on an export market of licorice and when the Aussie dollar grew stronger, they had to reduce their price significantly to compete overseas. This was done sometimes at a loss.
3. Their two biggest selling products were - Licorice and Rocky Road. To increase volumes on this they decided to sell these products to the major Supermarkets - bad decision. Consumers used to visit Darrel Lea stores for their licorice and would then buy other products which attracted good margin. Now they did not need to go to darrel Lea stores, instead they could get their Darrel Lea products from Woolworths or Coles. Very bad decision.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by John
Great to read your story, well done. But unfortunatly to late for our family business as we will also shut the doors at the end of July after 65 Yrs
Friday, July 13, 2012 by John
Hi Alvin, apparently since 2006 "Michael Lea is now the only family member on the board." [From http://www.companydirectors.com.au/Director-Resource-Centre/Publications/Company-Director-magazine/Back-editions-2000-2009/2006/January/cover-story-the-search-for-a-successor]

"There used to be 13 family members working in the business, but now there’s only three."
Friday, July 13, 2012 by Chocoholic
As a Gen X kid I coveted sheets of nut chocolate displayed in Daaell Lea windows, but then I grew up, my taste became increasingly sophisticated, I demanded better quality and I wanted to shop in store environments that delight. Meanwhile Darrell Lea stood still becoming a pariah of its genre. It showcased product in stores that only my grandmother could love and whether perceived or true, it failed to deliver on a promise of quality. Clearly I, like so many others of my and subsequent generations, shared this view as we abandoned Darrel Lea for the queues at Haighes and Lindt.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by Alvin
MBA
New blood was indeed bought in, however, the board remained the same. no point bringing in new blood when the controlling members stayed the same and the infighting remained the same. as stated before the main cause of the demise of the company can be blames squarely on the bickering between siblings. Unfortunate but true.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by Marion Adker- Bishop
So sad to see a family business fail-
The Chocolate Box is over now 50+ and the second generation is well and truely in place-
However I feel the most beneficial changes were made when one member spent twenty odd years in Europe building another Business and then coming back in with a refreshed outlook, feel this could be the key.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by BERNARDZ
As a person that dealt with Darrell Lea for many years though EDI, although I do admit distantly, from what I saw they were not resistance to change towards the end. It was when they were doing well twenty-five years ago when that was true. Then they were the worst of suppliers with computerization that I had to deal with. Even electronic catalogues they refused to discuss.

However, recently they became very progressive.

Friday, July 13, 2012 by retail princess
Isn't if funny how your childhood memories of an iconic brand take you to a special place with inspiration and awe, customer service with a smile, taste samplings and ladies in brightly coloured dresses with embracing the magic of chocolate and all the happy memories it brings. It seems as the generations grew up, they were handed their jobs and lifestyles on a platter without regard for the hard work that went into developing an iconic Australian brand. The last media article I read on Darrell Lea was regarding one "Lea" socialite having a lavish wedding - no expense spared and being transported by sea plan, because she had lost her licence drink driving..there's two sides to every story and I think Stuart Bennie has a very valid point that should not be discounted!
Friday, July 13, 2012 by Peter
MBA that is definately a recipe for disaster, to know where Darrell Lea started to go wrong we would need to go back to where the problems began which we will never really know, they know but its probably now a blame game for them.
Certainly there have been issues there, I still believe that they could have survived by not changing their image as it was their image that set them aside from anyone else as it stood for timeless quality. One of the major issues that I can see is they were simply forgotten while other alternatives became available, a company cannot just stand on their brand and open more stores and do nothing because as other generations come up they wont know who they are, weather they could have sold into Coles, definately on the short term their sales would have increased but it could also damage their brand in the long run. Unfortuantely what I think or anyone else says is irrelevant, there were collective resaons that paved the way for their collapse and no one sets out to destroy their own business, we all do what we think is right at the perticular point in time.
One things for sure they had a good brand and their products were excellent (stocking the generics was a desperate attempt and that would have damaged the brand in itself) with the right person behind Darrell Lea and the cash that company would grow even in these tough economic times.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by HIS
Have been reading with interest the demise of Darrell Lea and other Retail established businesses over the past few months. I cannot believe how quick everyone is to blame the Companies themselves in these tough times. Even Myer are now saying it is the worst trading conditions in 25 years. Rent to sales is one of the biggest reasons for Retailers failing, and when sales go down and rent keeps rising there is only so much that can be done to trim the costs. How many of us are paying the rents that we paid 25 years ago. As with many Retailers the Landlord has now become their biggest creditor and until there is a level paying field with rent to sales we will continue to see Retailers closing in both Major Shopping Centres and Strip Centres as is currently happening.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by Natalie
In recent years I think Darrell Lea stores have had a good mix of original favourites and new products. Their stores have had a makeover with new logo etc and they have quality product. Could it be their pricing compared to other chocoltae products on the market? Could it be the cost of doing business and manufacturing in Australia? Could it be consumers not being prepared to buy at a certain price point putting pressure on margins? Cant go past a bit of Rocky Road, my personal favourite.
Friday, July 13, 2012 by Darrell
Interesting comment from MBA ... maybe Darrell Lea has suffered from the disease where "very clever people make very stupid decisions".
Thursday, July 12, 2012 by MBA
In fact with Darrell Lea, new blood was brought in and appointed an outsider as CEO, and another. Then his grand plans wwas to expand and built a multi-million dollar factory which they can't afford now, and also cannibalized their own iconic product by selling generic branded ones. ????

Leave your comment
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
Please note: all comments are subject to moderation for legal reasons and to prevent spam. We'll approve your comment as quickly as we can. If you don't see it appear you do not need to repost it.


Related news
 
Surfwear brands caught in a rip In today's Inside Retail Digital weekly, we take a look at the struggling surfwear sector, and see how several brands are searching the horizon for a sunnier patch of sky.
Paper clippings go digitalBargain hunters can throw away their supermarket receipt clippings, with Shop A Docket now going online.
Swan Services in adminNational cleaning company, with shopping centre clients, placed in voluntary administration.
Gap earnings soarClothing chain's turnaround continues as first quarter earnings rise.
 
 
Follow us  TwitterRSS Feeds

Australian Retail Chain Directory

LOG IN HERE


BUY HERE



Editors Picks
EXCLUSIVE FIRST LOOK: Open for businessEXCLUSIVE FIRST LOOK: Open for business
Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids, and West Elm open the doors on their first Aust...
Rollercoaster ride isn't over yetRollercoaster ride isn't over yet
Many retailers will see a light at the end of the tunnel in 2013, but shouldn't hope for a miracl...
Visual spectacularVisual spectacular
First impressions can be lasting, and quality VM can say volumes about a retail store before a cu...
The new luxuryThe new luxury
Baffled by fashion? French fashion consultant Jean Jacques Picart can simplify it for you.
Giving backGiving back
While some department stores are struggling, Britain's John Lewis is an example of one getting it...
The perfect stormThe perfect storm
Retailers will face further pain as the impact of global fast fashion giants entering the Austral...

Top Drop Shadow